We welcome your constructive comments and feedback regarding the game of Bridge.
Learn Duplicate Bridge and Contract Bridge - Let's play Bridge!
We welcome your constructive comments and feedback regarding the game of Bridge.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Allow BridgeHands to automatically EMAIL you a brief daily snippet when we have new blog posts here (OK but not necessary for members who SUBSCRIBE to Free, Premium or ULTRA)
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |||||
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Copyright © 2024 · Genesis Framework by StudioPress · WordPress · Log in
Subject ELCD ( equal level conversion double ) . Requirements for ELCD are : shortness in Club, 5+ diamonds , 4 cards in the unbid major and 12+ HCP. The question is : how many times in a year would one have a hand fulfilling such requirements ? It might happen , perhaps on Xmas but not every year I think. Frequency wise this treatment reminds me of Flannery convention : when you have the right hand it is usefull but you almost never do…
Turbo
Yes Turbo, agreed that after opponent makes an opening bid, holding a two suited shape that’s short in opponents suit as well as Clubs doesn’t come up all that often. And when the overcaller holds a hand with two 5+ card suits, often the better tool is using Michael’s cuebid or Unusual 2 Notrump. Experience shows ELCD usage is even less than the Flannery convention (5=4=?=? shape, less than 17 HCP), yet many high level tournament players find a time and place to use Equal Level Conversion Doubles. My sense is that until a serious Bridge player reaches 1,000 masterpoints and plays with a regular partner, the ELCD treatment probably doesn’t need to be played (unless they’re trying to impress an opponent when the overcaller doubles, advancer bids 2C, and overcaller bids a new suit).
Happy trails, Michael